Breaking News

Inpex still awaits approval of Masela Block PoD, committed to develop the block

JAKARTA ( – Inpex Corporation of Japan said it is still waiting for the approval of the revised Planned of Development (PoD) of Abadi Field within Masela Blcok and hopes that the government would give clear direction so that the project can be continued.

“Once the government approved the revision of the plan of development one (PoD 1), which will hopefully in line with our expectation, Inpex and Shell will immediately move on to the next stage of development, namely the FEED (front-end engineering design) stage,” Inpex said in a statement.

Previously, the Special Task Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Business (SKK Migas) Chairman Amien Sunaryadi said the delayed decision on the approval of the Masela Block PoD has forced the operator of the block to downsize the number of employees deployed to develop the Masela Block by as much as 40 percent or around 90-100 people, including 48 engineers of Shell in Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur and Netherland.

Inpex, however, stressed that it remains committed to develop the Abadi Field gas  project in Masela Block, said Inpex Senior Communication Manager Usman Slamet.

With regard to comments from SKK Migas on workforce, Usman said Inpex and Shell would always adjust the number of workforce in one project depending on the need.

The approval of the revised PoD I was supposed to be given in September of last year, however, until now the approval is yet to be given amid controversy whether the production facilities should be built offshore (FLNG) or onshore.

The key PoD proposed by Inpex was developing offshore facilities, namely Floating LNG (FLNG), instead of onshore plant. Developing onshore facilities are considered to be too costly and inefficient.

However, the public has been divided over the location of the processing facility. Coordinating Minister for the Maritime Affairs Rizal Ramli has been pushing the government to approve developing onshore processing plant, instead of Floating LNG.  Maluku provincial government has also demanded that the processing facilities are built onshore.

Minister for Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) Sudirman Said told reporters after the meeting that all arguments have been put on the table, the pros and cons of building FLNG and onshore production facilities, including the investment to develop the Masela block.

He said the investment to build offshore processing facilities through FLNG is estimated to reach US$14.3 billion, lower than developing onshore processing facilities in Tanimbar Island, which amounting to US$19.8 billion. If onshore facilities are built in Aru Island, the costs would be even higher at US$22.3 billion.

The Abadi Field project would take several years before it could come onstream. Design engineering and final investment decision (FID) will take place in the next three years and if things go ahead as planned, the construction would begin in 2019 and then would come onstream in 2023-2024.

However, such timeline is likely to change and may push back the commercial operation of the project in 2026, according to Amien Sunaryadi.

The existing operator’s contract to develop the Masela block will expire in 2028. Inpex has earlier requested the government to extend its contract to another 20 years after 2028. The company argues if the project would come onstream in 2024, its investment will not recover its investment.

Currently, Inpex holds 65 percent working interest in Masela Block and the remaining 35 percent is held by Shell.

The block contains huge gas reserves of around 10.7 trillion cubic feet (tcf). Block Masela covers 4,291.35 square kilometers area, about 800 km to the east of Kupang town, the capital of NTT and over 400 km from Darwin, Australia at water depth of 300-1,000 meters. (*)


Check Also

Tangguh LNG project in West Papua

SKK Migas expects Inpex to submit revised PoD for Masela block in 2019

JAKARTA ( - The Special Task Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Business (SKK Migas) ...

One comment

  1. I believe with the condition of oil/gas industry is not good especially oil and gas pricing that it is impossible to get an approval of POD 1 revision and also is not obtained for the firm gas consumer under HoA before GSPA.

    One of development gas field concept is to separate for the upstream and the downstream model. It may better for wells, umbilical, risers and production facility with upstream model and either LNG Processing or CNG Processing or GTL Processing and its transportation under Downstream Model. So, the cost recovery under Government obligation is only concentration at Upstream Model and this will minimize the cost recovery for the government. While downstream
    Activity can be the consortium of local government company, foreign company, local private company and also the project owner of upstream model. So the HOA/ GSPA can be established for the Guarantee of project financing since the off taker gas Abadi Field from the consortium of downstream company will be gas buyers, and I believe then the revision Pod 1 can be acceleratedly approved by the government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *